4.3.Review Workflow

From submission to security-verified launch.

Every project submitted to OPPAD goes through a strict, sequential audit pipeline. The review workflow ensures no project can bypass validation, pay to be approved, or hide behind fake badges.


🧭 Step-by-Step Flow

  1. Project Submitted  - Dev fills the application  - Token and launch logic uploaded

  2. AegisAI™ Audit Triggered  - Contract scanned instantly  - Issues flagged in <5 mins  - Score + risk level recorded

  3. If Passed → Go to Sentinel  - If Critical: Blocked  - If Warning: Sent for explanation

  4. Sentinel Review Begins  - Human auditors inspect logic  - Match declared tokenomics vs code  - Check dependencies and forks

  5. Final Review Outcome  - ✅ Pass = Audit Badge  - ⚠️ Warning = Soft flag + Badge  - ❌ Reject = Launch blocked

  6. Results Published  - Audit score and badge displayed on frontend  - Stored on-chain for transparency



🔁 Resubmission Support

Projects that fail any stage may:

  • View their audit logs

  • Fix issues

  • Resubmit once for re-review

[!TIP] Multiple failed attempts will flag the project internally and lock its form.


🧾 What Makes It Different?

  • 🛑 Unskippable: All projects must pass both layers

  • 💵 Unbribable: No paid audits or skip tokens

  • 🔍 Verifiable: Review data stored off-chain + verified badge stored on-chain

[!INFO] This process ensures only credible, secure, and honest projects are launched through OPPAD.

Last updated