OPPAD OFFICIAL WHITEPAPER
  • 🧠 I. Vision & Foundations
    • 1.Abstract
    • 2.Introduction
    • 3.Market Analysis
    • 4.Problem Statement
  • 5.Solution Overview
  • 🏗️ II. Technical Core & Infrastructure
    • 1.Platform Architecture
      • 1.1.Front-end
      • 1.2.backend
      • 1.3.smart contract overview
    • 2.Security Measures
    • 3.Database
    • 4.Dual Review Mechanism
      • 4.1.AegisAI™ (AI Reviewer Engine)
      • 4.2.Sentinel Review (Manual Process)
      • 4.3.Review Workflow
      • 4.4.Risk Classification System
    • 5.API & Integrations
  • 🚀 III. Launch Engine
    • 1.Presale
    • 2.Fairlaunch
    • 3.Stealth Launch
    • 4.Token Creation
    • 5.OPPADLock
    • 6.Badges
    • 7.Dynamic Whitelists & Participation Settings
    • 8.Built-in KYC & Audit
  • 📕O-Pump Mode™
    • 1.What is O-Pump?
    • 2.How It Works
    • 3.Super Projects
    • 4.Safety First
    • 5.O-Pump vs Others
    • 6.Use Cases
  • 📕 V. OPPAD Economic Engine
    • 1.Staking
    • 2.NFT Passes
    • 3.Farming & Rewards
      • How to Launch a Farm in 3 Steps
    • 4.Revenue Sharing
  • 📘 VI. Governance & Continuity
    • 1.Legal Compliance
    • 2.Error Handling
    • 3.Roadmap
  • 📕OFFICIAL LINKS AND SOCIALS
    • Website
    • Tokenomics
    • Official Telegram Community
    • Github
    • Discord
    • Youtube
    • Tiktok
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. 🏗️ II. Technical Core & Infrastructure
  2. 4.Dual Review Mechanism

4.4.Risk Classification System

A standardized way to grade smart contract threats and transparency gaps.

To ensure clarity for both investors and developers, OPPAD uses a tiered risk classification system during the review process. This system applies to both AegisAI™ and Sentinel Review, helping categorize the severity of issues found in a project’s smart contracts or configuration.


[!INFO] This system is not just for backend scoring — risk levels are visible on the project dashboard and determine badge status, launch eligibility, and user alerts.


🎯 Risk Tiers

Risk Level

Description

✅ Pass

No critical or major issues. Ready to launch with full audit badge.

⚠️ Warning

Non-critical risks or questionable design choices. Requires flag or notice.

❌ Critical

Serious flaws, malicious patterns, or undeclared behavior. Launch blocked.


🧠 Risk Evaluation Factors

Risk is classified based on a combination of:

  • Exploitability: Can the issue be used to harm users or drain funds?

  • Stealth: Is the logic hidden or intentionally obfuscated?

  • Mismatch: Does the contract contradict declared tokenomics or features?

  • Repeat Patterns: Does the contract resemble known scams or rug templates?

  • Centralization Risk: Can the dev or owner pause, blacklist, or mint arbitrarily?


🔄 Cross-Layer Consistency

  • AegisAI™ assigns a numerical score (0–100) with thresholds for Warning and Critical.

  • Sentinel reviewers confirm, override, or elevate the AI-assigned risk based on human logic.

  • Final classification is stored on-chain and reflected in the badge system.

[!WARNING] Even a project that passes AegisAI™ can be downgraded to Critical by Sentinel if manual logic review reveals deception or unlisted features.


🧾 Example Classifications

Finding

Risk Level

Hidden Mint Function

❌ Critical

Tax Fee Higher than Declared

⚠️ Warning

Ownership Transfer Without Notice

⚠️ Warning

Standard ERC20 with Clean Logic

✅ Pass

Blacklisting or Whitelisting Code

❌ Critical

Audit Disclosure Mismatch

⚠️ Warning


[!TIP] OPPAD does not hide risk — we standardize and expose it so users can decide with full visibility.

Previous4.3.Review WorkflowNext5.API & Integrations

Last updated 5 days ago